- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 13:46:30 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1824 ------- Additional Comments From colin@colina.demon.co.uk 2005-09-06 13:46 ------- Well, it imposes an additional burden on the processor, which is unnecessary for solving the particular problem. So, if I (for instance), were to simply implement returning an xs:string from these two functions, would there be any way of telling that I WASN'T implementing a general recognition of schema types desceded from the built-in types?
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2005 13:46:36 UTC