- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:44:32 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1824 ------- Additional Comments From mike@saxonica.com 2005-09-06 12:44 ------- Colin: the reason I didn't want to do it the way you suggested is that it's not a good idea for one spec to try and override another: "ignore what X says and do it this way instead". Rather, it's better to show that this is just a special case of a problem that's already addressed in the XPath spec, of how to handle values with dynamic types that aren't present in the static context. The end effect might be the same, but it's better to build on the mechanisms already there than to introduce an arbitrary special case. This also points the way to solving other related problems that might arise in the future, e.g. XSLT making calls to a function library written in XQuery. We have to adapt the wording of XSLT 21.1 a little to handle this, but it basically works. Michael Kay
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2005 12:44:37 UTC