W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2005

[Bug 1967] [F+O] Year Zero

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 20:54:08 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1EBf1c-0002d2-Pf@wiggum.w3.org>


------- Additional Comments From liam@w3.org  2005-09-03 20:54 -------
> The problem is that there have traditionally been two definitions
> of the proleptic Gregorian calendar

I see, thanks for the clarification!

In this case I don't have an opinion except that we obviously
need to be aligned with Schema, and it's not clear what the
Schema WG will do.. allowing an implementation to raise an
error if dates involving years <= 0 may be plausible.

I do worry slightly about people writing code to see if one
date is before the other by whether the result of a subtraction
is negative, but the obvious ways to do that all result in
Received on Saturday, 3 September 2005 20:54:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:08 UTC