- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:04:59 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2343 mike@saxonica.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |LATER ------- Additional Comments From mike@saxonica.com 2005-10-15 09:04 ------- Thanks for the comment. The last call period is over, but the comment will be held over and considered during the next phase. However, we're now applying very strict criteria, and only making changes to fix errors and inconsistencies, not simply because someone has identified a way of improving the language. It's probably true that these two attributes could have been made more consistent. However, their value space isn't the same (one is a list of QNames, the other a list of NCNames), and they serve very different purposes. And as you point out in your final remark, once we start hunting for opportunities to make disparate things more consistent, there are a lot of places to look. At this stage, we're all keen to get finished. Michael Kay personal response
Received on Saturday, 15 October 2005 09:05:04 UTC