W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > October 2005

[Bug 2343] Syntax for @mode and @exclude-result-prefixes ins't alligned

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:04:59 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1EQhyN-0006rh-1z@wiggum.w3.org>


mike@saxonica.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |LATER

------- Additional Comments From mike@saxonica.com  2005-10-15 09:04 -------
Thanks for the comment. The last call period is over, but the comment will be
held over and considered during the next phase. However, we're now applying very
strict criteria, and only making changes to fix errors and inconsistencies, not
simply because someone has identified a way of improving the language.

It's probably true that these two attributes could have been made more
consistent. However, their value space isn't the same (one is a list of QNames,
the other a list of NCNames), and they serve very different purposes. And as you
point out in your final remark, once we start hunting for opportunities to make
disparate things more consistent, there are a lot of places to look. At this
stage, we're all keen to get finished.

Michael Kay
personal response
Received on Saturday, 15 October 2005 09:05:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:09 UTC