- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:30:07 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2535 ------- Additional Comments From mike@saxonica.com 2005-11-18 21:30 ------- The general rule for deep-equal() is that two sequences A and B are deep-equal if count(A) = count(B) and every $n in (1 to count(A)) satisfies deep-equal(A[$n], B[$n]). A consequence of this is that deep-equal((), ()) is true. This is because in mathematical logic (every x in X satisfies C) is always true when X is empty. deep-equal() and = adopt fundamentally different ways of comparing two sequences, both of which are useful. It should not be suprising that they give different results for the empty sequence, since they also give different results for most other sequences. Michael Kay personal response
Received on Friday, 18 November 2005 21:30:17 UTC