[Bug 1444] [FO] Editorial: canonical forms of (-)0e0


ashok.malhotra@oracle.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

------- Additional Comments From ashok.malhotra@oracle.com  2005-05-18 22:31 -------
I'm sorry but I disagree.  The canonical form for float/double is defined in
this paragraph.  The forms for positive and negative zero are specially called
out as these are special values.  Smart users may be able to infer these forms
from the preceding general rules but a bit of redundancy does no harm.

Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2005 22:48:28 UTC