- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 20:24:19 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1358 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.robie@datadirect.com 2005-05-18 20:24 ------- (In reply to comment #2) First off, I *think* that this is all referring to the following comment, right? The current rules, which allow only one collation to be specified, raise an error if the collation is not supported, and use anyURIs to identify collations without any mechanism for giving anyURIs to well-known collations, are bound to lead to interoperability problems. Collations should not be the major source of interoperability problems. With the current design, even vendors who want to be interoperable have no chance of doing so. It will often be the case that e.g. a user wants just 'a French collation'. How can this be indicated? > Suppose a user who wants to make a linguistic analysis of texts, and variation > in collations - e.g. due to historic differences - is a crucial part of the > analysis. Of course this is an unusal case, but my point is that such a user > would not like to change the API or a parameter. The collation would be part of > the query / analysis. It's extremely unlikely, of course, that a standard collation for Greek would take into account the historical variations in spelling over the last 7,000 years, and I can't figure out how the proposed solution fits your use case. I think your user is better served by the ability to bind a collation URI to a custom collation that takes itacization into account, a collation that may be tailored to the specific kind of analysis intended. You also say we should consider the case where "a user wants just 'a French collation'. I would welcome a standard set of names for collations, if one emerges, but this is way beyond the scope of the XML Query Working Group, and might require years of effort, negotiating with representatives of the countries involved. And it would also require significant domain expertise - which of the potential French collations should be used for the person who wants just 'a French collation'? We have the mechanism to refer to these collations by URI if such a standard emerges.
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2005 20:27:22 UTC