[Bug 1382] [XQuery] some editorial comments on A.1.1 grammar-note: occurrence-indicators


scott_boag@us.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
         AssignedTo|chamberl@almaden.ibm.com    |scott_boag@us.ibm.com
           Severity|normal                      |minor

------- Additional Comments From scott_boag@us.ibm.com  2005-05-17 15:52 -------
> Even when the only possible derivation says it's not an occurrence
> indicator?  So in
>       4 treat as item() + 5
> the '+' is assumed to be an occurrence indicator, which would then lead to a
> syntax error? Probably yes, but might be good to say so.

Yes, and it does say so.  But it could be clarified, along with an example.

Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2005 15:57:28 UTC