W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2005

[Bug 1382] [XQuery] some editorial comments on A.1.1 grammar-note: occurrence-indicators

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 15:52:42 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1DY4N8-00071e-IG@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1382


scott_boag@us.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|chamberl@almaden.ibm.com    |scott_boag@us.ibm.com
           Severity|normal                      |minor




------- Additional Comments From scott_boag@us.ibm.com  2005-05-17 15:52 -------
> Even when the only possible derivation says it's not an occurrence
> indicator?  So in
>       4 treat as item() + 5
> the '+' is assumed to be an occurrence indicator, which would then lead to a
> syntax error? Probably yes, but might be good to say so.

Yes, and it does say so.  But it could be clarified, along with an example.
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2005 15:57:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:05 UTC