http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1319 ------- Additional Comments From mukul_gandhi@yahoo.com 2005-05-14 03:10 ------- Thank you for updating about this topic. I am happy, that this is considered significant, and some discussion is going on.. I now feel, that the definition is right. For e.g., at other place, XSLT 2.0 spec says(Section 2.4) "evaluating the sequence constructor of the initial template as described in 5.7 Sequence Constructors. If the result is a non-empty sequence ...". So if there is a empty sequence, the definition still applies! So the present defition of XSLT processor is also right.. The reasoning I (had/am) (posted/posting), are my random thoughts.. Regards, MukulReceived on Saturday, 14 May 2005 03:10:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:05 UTC