- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 23:34:22 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1441
Summary: [XQX] complex type derivation vs substitution group
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Last Call drafts
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XQueryX
AssignedTo: jim.melton@acm.org
ReportedBy: mrys@microsoft.com
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
During the review, we discussed whether we prefer one or the other. It quickly
showed, that there are use cases and needs for both. E.g., complex type
derivation is easier to map with popular type to object model mappers while
substitution provides for better XPath discoverability of the information.
We propose (after talking to one of the editors) that the spec should provide
both approaches with some guidelines on when one may be preferable over the
other and provide a transform between them (as it was available in previous
internal drafts)
Received on Friday, 13 May 2005 23:34:28 UTC