- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 20:13:31 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1409
Summary: [DM] are lax attributes of type xdt:untypedAtomic?
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Last Call drafts
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Data Model
AssignedTo: Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM
ReportedBy: mrys@microsoft.com
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
"- The [validity] property exists and is not "valid", or the [validition
attempted] property exists and is not "full", the schema type of an element is
xs:anyType and the type of an attribute is xdt:untypedAtomic."
Wasn't that changed in Brisbane to be xs:anySimpleType for attributes?
The Brisbane minutes are not a 100% clear. The advantage of xdt:untypedAtomic
is that since that is the atomized dynamic type in this case anyway, it gives
a better static type inference since we can statically assume such attributes
(eg. in lax validation contexts) to be always untyped. The advantage of
xs:anySimpleType is that it is aligned with schema.
Received on Friday, 13 May 2005 20:13:36 UTC