W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2005

[Bug 1409] New: [DM] are lax attributes of type xdt:untypedAtomic?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 20:13:31 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1DWgXL-0003N9-Dv@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1409

           Summary: [DM] are lax attributes of type xdt:untypedAtomic?
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Last Call drafts
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Data Model
        AssignedTo: Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM
        ReportedBy: mrys@microsoft.com
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org


"- The [validity] property exists and is not "valid", or the [validition 
attempted] property exists and is not "full", the schema type of an element is 
xs:anyType and the type of an attribute is xdt:untypedAtomic."

Wasn't that changed in Brisbane to be xs:anySimpleType for attributes? 

The Brisbane minutes are not a 100% clear. The advantage of xdt:untypedAtomic 
is that since that is the atomized dynamic type in this case anyway, it gives 
a better static type inference since we can statically assume such attributes 
(eg. in lax validation contexts) to be always untyped. The advantage of 
xs:anySimpleType is that it is aligned with schema.
Received on Friday, 13 May 2005 20:13:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:05 UTC