- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 20:13:31 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1409 Summary: [DM] are lax attributes of type xdt:untypedAtomic? Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Last Call drafts Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Data Model AssignedTo: Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM ReportedBy: mrys@microsoft.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org "- The [validity] property exists and is not "valid", or the [validition attempted] property exists and is not "full", the schema type of an element is xs:anyType and the type of an attribute is xdt:untypedAtomic." Wasn't that changed in Brisbane to be xs:anySimpleType for attributes? The Brisbane minutes are not a 100% clear. The advantage of xdt:untypedAtomic is that since that is the atomized dynamic type in this case anyway, it gives a better static type inference since we can statically assume such attributes (eg. in lax validation contexts) to be always untyped. The advantage of xs:anySimpleType is that it is aligned with schema.
Received on Friday, 13 May 2005 20:13:36 UTC