- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 19:38:04 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1286 ------- Additional Comments From jim.melton@acm.org 2005-05-11 19:38 ------- The XML Query Working Group considered this comment and has concluded that there is not actually a technical error in the XQueryX specifications. Instead, the WG believes that the comment provides justification for an example that more meaningfully demonstrates the use of namespaces in XQueryX, as well as one or more informative Notes that remind the reader of the relationships of XQueryX namespace usage and XQuery namespace usage. The editor was given authority to select a meaningful and useful example and add it to the XQueryX spec. Please let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision.
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2005 19:38:11 UTC