- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 12:55:45 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1290
Summary: infixOp
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Last Call drafts
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XQueryX
AssignedTo: jim.melton@acm.org
ReportedBy: davidc@nag.co.uk
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Issue: xqueryx-operator-syntax, priority: 3, status: open
This issue asks for comments on the
<xqx;[sic]infixOp/>
<xqx;[sic]opType>+</xqx:opType>
syntax.
Unless I missed something the syntax could be improved by simply dropping all
mention of infixOp.
All operators are infix apart from unary plus and minus aren't they?
The stylesheet already has to special case unary +/- to use "+" or "-" symbols,
so it could special case them to be non-infix at the same time. It isn't clear
to me that an xqueryx document needs to record the infix nature of an operation
which is part of the concrete syntx of xquery not part of the logical expression
tree.
David
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 12:55:52 UTC