- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 12:55:45 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1290 Summary: infixOp Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Last Call drafts Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XQueryX AssignedTo: jim.melton@acm.org ReportedBy: davidc@nag.co.uk QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org Issue: xqueryx-operator-syntax, priority: 3, status: open This issue asks for comments on the <xqx;[sic]infixOp/> <xqx;[sic]opType>+</xqx:opType> syntax. Unless I missed something the syntax could be improved by simply dropping all mention of infixOp. All operators are infix apart from unary plus and minus aren't they? The stylesheet already has to special case unary +/- to use "+" or "-" symbols, so it could special case them to be non-infix at the same time. It isn't clear to me that an xqueryx document needs to record the infix nature of an operation which is part of the concrete syntx of xquery not part of the logical expression tree. David
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 12:55:52 UTC