- From: Paul J. Lucas <plucas@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:07:33 -0800 (PST)
- To: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
- cc: Daniela Florescu <dflorescu@mac.com>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
It was a request *only* for the rationale of the change (just like I originally said). It it not a request for a clarification; it is not alluding to any possible bug. - Paul On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Paul Cotton wrote: > ... adding Paul since I doubt he is subscribed to the comments list. > > /paulc > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 > Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- >> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Daniela Florescu >> Sent: February 28, 2005 8:19 AM >> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org >> Subject: Re: FS quantifiers >> >> >> Dear Paul, >> >> On 2004/5/13 you sent the following question: >> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2004May/0029.html >> >> Is your question a simple request for clarification or does it point > to a >> bug in >> the definition of quantifiers in the Formal Semantics ? In the second > case, >> could you please give us more details on the potential problems that > you >> see ? >> >> thanks, best regards, >> Dana Florescu >> > >
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2005 04:07:37 UTC