- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:12:07 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1721 ------- Additional Comments From simeon@us.ibm.com 2005-07-26 15:12 ------- I think I take it back and that Michael is right. We don't really need the best type in this particular case. There are a few places where we need it (in type promotion for instance), but not there. We do need to fix all the Expr <: Type into Expr : Type though. - Jerome
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:12:11 UTC