[Bug 1389] [XQuery] some editorial comments on A.4 Precedence Order

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1389





------- Additional Comments From jmdyck@ibiblio.org  2005-07-22 20:54 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think the section is unnecessary and redundent.  But a
> lot of our WG thinks it's helpful, so there you have it.
> It is probably useful for users to have the handy table.

If a section is unnecessary and redundant, but helpful and useful, wouldn't it
normally be made non-normative?

Received on Friday, 22 July 2005 20:54:37 UTC