- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:23:59 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1566 ------- Additional Comments From simeon@us.ibm.com 2005-07-21 17:23 ------- yes to all counts. we would only provide a prose definition for that judgment. IntegerValue was intended in that rule. We have to make sure the right hand side of the judgment is a formal value (grammar production AtomicValueContent) - Jerome
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2005 17:24:04 UTC