- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:25:49 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1554 ------- Additional Comments From jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2005-07-21 00:25 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > A more drastic approach would be to remove the material on error propagation > entirely from the Formal Semantics document. Including the removal of all "Dynamic Errors" sections? That is drastic! But I'm inclined to think it's a good idea: -- The FS doesn't attempt to be complete on errors *anyway* (i.e., it doesn't refer to specific error codes, and it totally ignores static errors). -- I suspect that most of the 'Dynamic Error' rules cover cases where the Dynamic Evaluation rules would simply fail to hold, and the inference would fail to yield a value. So in a sense, the 'Dynamic Error' rules are redundant. (Interestingly, I have a feeling that this is *not* true of many/most? static errors.) -- It would eliminate a fair bit of bulk, and some of the ickier rules.
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2005 00:25:55 UTC