- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:43:45 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1701
simeon@us.ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From simeon@us.ibm.com 2005-07-20 20:43 -------
I agree we should make sure to respell [For/FLWR] to [For/FLWOR].
We should also explains what that mean. We can do it as you suggest, possibly we
could also indicate this right at the beginning in the preliminaries.
Any preference about how we do this?
- Jerome
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2005 20:43:50 UTC