- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 14:52:58 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1527
------- Additional Comments From scott_boag@us.ibm.com 2005-07-20 14:52 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> @attribute(*, xs:date)
I'm not sure what the "@" buys you here. Why is that different from simply
attribute(*, xs:date)
?
FYI, I've tested your proposal and it works fine. But maybe we should go ahead
and leave it alone, since it would be another XPath 1.0 incompatibility, which I
would like to avoid.
-scott
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2005 14:53:31 UTC