- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 01:14:54 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1622 Summary: a union type does not have a base type Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Last Call drafts Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Formal Semantics AssignedTo: simeon@us.ibm.com ReportedBy: fred.zemke@oracle.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org 2.4.4 Top level definitions First para following the rules for formal EBNF, second sentence: "In the case of a complex type, or a simple type derived by list or union, derivation indicates if the type is derived by extension or restriction from its base type." But: a union type does not have a base type, so the reference to them appears out of place here.
Received on Friday, 15 July 2005 01:14:58 UTC