- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 01:14:54 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1622
Summary: a union type does not have a base type
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Last Call drafts
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Formal Semantics
AssignedTo: simeon@us.ibm.com
ReportedBy: fred.zemke@oracle.com
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
2.4.4 Top level definitions
First para following the rules for formal EBNF, second sentence:
"In the case of a complex type, or a simple type derived by list
or union, derivation indicates if the type is derived by extension
or restriction from its base type." But: a union type does not
have a base type, so the reference to them appears out of place
here.
Received on Friday, 15 July 2005 01:14:58 UTC