- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 19:18:27 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1390 ------- Additional Comments From scott_boag@us.ibm.com 2005-07-09 19:18 ------- (In reply to comment #0) I don't think this design or language is clearer than the existing design or language, though I may end up using some parts of it, the Filler production, for example. I certainly don't want to start using example parse trees. Once I'm done with all other modifications, the WG can compare that draft with this proposal and decide if they want to make a more radical change.
Received on Saturday, 9 July 2005 19:18:32 UTC