[Bug 1377] [XQuery] some editorial comments on A.1.1 grammar-note: lt

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1377





------- Additional Comments From scott_boag@us.ibm.com  2005-07-07 17:17 -------
I don't love MSM's  proposed wording.  I think there are three alternatives:
1) Use the word "parser" instead of tokenizer" but otherwise keep the note as is.
2) Wait for someone to come up with alternative text that we can all live with.
3) Drop the note.

The issue and the subsequent decision was a result of a concern by one of the WG
members that treatment of "<" was unclear.  I think that was before we were
keeping issue numbers, and I'm not going through the mail archives looking for
instances of "<".

I'm happy with either #1 or #3, slightly favoring #3.

Received on Thursday, 7 July 2005 17:17:37 UTC