- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 01:24:51 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1377 ------- Additional Comments From jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2005-07-07 01:24 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Aside from the use of the word "tokenizer", I think the note needs to stay, > particularly since it's the result of a specific WG decision to resolve an issue. Which decision and which issue?
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2005 01:24:53 UTC