- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 04:55:26 -0700
- To: bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org, public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC: fsasaki@w3.org
There is, perhaps, a misunderstanding behind this comment. Implicit timezones are used in date/time arithmetic to allow comparisons between date/times with and without timezones. They are supplied by the system for the operation and not stored in the document or datamodel. Thus, there is no issue re. more than one implicit timezone stored in one or more documents or conversion between them. There is, at most, one implicit timezone for a query. All the best, Ashok > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 12:31 AM > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: [Bug 1334] no implicit conversion between time zones > > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1334 > > > fsasaki@w3.org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > -------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------- > Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED > Resolution|WONTFIX | > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From fsasaki@w3.org 2005-07-06 > 07:30 ------- consensus of the i18n-core wg (telecon 6 July 2005): > > A problem remains: What do you do if have several documents, > with several > (implicit) timezones? We don't think that your solution is > interoperable. We propose to have a joint call between the > working groups on the topic. Please tell us a convinient time. > > Best regards, Felix Sasaki. > > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2005 11:55:37 UTC