- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:19:07 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1519 frans.englich@telia.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From frans.englich@telia.com 2005-07-01 21:19 ------- Ok. In effect, the -datatypes namespace is an arbitrary namespace with no special meaning in any context. This namespace-issue is a bit confusing matter, in my opinion. It might clear future confusion if the -datatypes namespace was explicitly mentioned in a specification(xslt20?), and outline the rationale. It might be informative, but also promote conformance among implementations, since if special treatment of the -datatypes namespace is implemented, it can lead to clashes with user code(this change to the specification is a suggestion, not a request). (I am fine with having the bug report closed as INVALID, or any other resolution.) Cheers, Frans
Received on Friday, 1 July 2005 21:19:09 UTC