- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:19:07 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1519
frans.englich@telia.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From frans.englich@telia.com 2005-07-01 21:19 -------
Ok. In effect, the -datatypes namespace is an arbitrary namespace with no
special meaning in any context.
This namespace-issue is a bit confusing matter, in my opinion. It might clear
future confusion if the -datatypes namespace was explicitly mentioned in a
specification(xslt20?), and outline the rationale. It might be informative, but
also promote conformance among implementations, since if special treatment of
the -datatypes namespace is implemented, it can lead to clashes with user
code(this change to the specification is a suggestion, not a request).
(I am fine with having the bug report closed as INVALID, or any other
resolution.)
Cheers,
Frans
Received on Friday, 1 July 2005 21:19:09 UTC