RE: [XSLT]Built-in types

Ashok,

XML Schema Part 2 says that integer is a built-in type:

http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PER-xmlschema-2-20040318/#built-in-datatypes

Michael Kay 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com] 
> Sent: 27 January 2005 13:09
> To: Michael Kay; Kenneth Stephen; public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [XSLT]Built-in types
> 
> Mike, integer is not a built in type in Schema.  We decided 
> to treat it
> a built-in type in QT.  So, the earlier text was correct.  
> You can reword
> it if you wish to correct the misreading.
> 
> All the best, Ashok
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kay
> > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 4:44 AM
> > To: 'Kenneth Stephen'; public-qt-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: [XSLT]Built-in types
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks for pointing out this inconsistency.
> > 
> > In fact this text is going to change: the XSL WG has 
> decided that a basic
> > XSLT processor should recognize all the built-in types 
> defined in XML
> > Schema.
> > 
> > Michael Kay
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
> > > [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
> > > Kenneth Stephen
> > > Sent: 24 January 2005 01:51
> > > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> > > Subject: [XSLT]Built-in types
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >    In section 3.13 of the XSLT 2.0 spec I see :
> > >
> > > <quote>
> > > All the primitive atomic types defined in [XML Schema] 
> (Part 2), with
> > > the exception of xs:NOTATION. That is: xs:string, xs:boolean,
> > > xs:integer, xs:decimal, xs:double, xs:float, xs:date, xs:time,
> > > xs:dateTime, xs:duration, xs:QName, xs:anyURI, xs:gDay, 
> xs:gMonthDay,
> > > xs:gMonth, xs:gYearMonth, xs:gYear, xs:base64Binary, 
> xs:hexBinary, and
> > > xs:QName.
> > >
> > > The derived atomic type xs:integer defined in [XML Schema]
> > > (Part 2).</quote>
> > >
> > >    Surely xs:integer cannot be both a primitive atomic 
> type as well
> > > as a derived atomic type? An examination of the 
> referenced XML Schema
> > > spec shows that it is a type derived from xs:decimal.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kenneth
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 27 January 2005 13:51:29 UTC