- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:44:01 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1850 ------- Additional Comments From mike@saxonica.com 2005-08-31 14:43 ------- Here are some observations from Java: (a) it appears that a character matches a range if any case-variant of the character matches the range: matches("D", "[A-Z]", "i") = true matches("d", "[A-Z]", "i") = true (b) this rule also works for subtractions: matches("D", "[A-Z-[D]]", "i") = true matches("d", "[A-Z-[D]]", "i") = true (c) the rule doesn't work for negative character groups. Here it appears that ^d removes both "d" and "D" from the group (whereas the rule above would suggest that it removes neither) matches("D", "[^d]", "i") = false matches("d", "[^d]", "i") = false (d) it appears that the "i" flag has no effect on character blocks. matches("D", "\p[Lu]", "i") = true; matches("d", "\p[Lu]", "i") = false; matches("D", "\P[Lu]", "i") = false; matches("d", "\P[Lu]", "i") = true; This is a terribly empirical way of approaching a specification!
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:44:21 UTC