- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:33:35 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1222 ------- Additional Comments From joannet@ca.ibm.com 2005-08-17 18:33 ------- This proposal was rejected because the working group felt that the effect of those parameters is too open ended. If such effect is required by an implementation, it can be accomplished by defining a new output method.
Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:33:38 UTC