- From: Don Chamberlin <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:44:23 -0400
- To: David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2004 00:44:58 UTC
David, The Query working group has considered your comment, attached below, and accepted your proposal. The revised paragraph in the description of the typeswitch expression reads as follows: "In a case or default clause, if the value to be returned depends on the value of the operand expression, the clause must specify a variable name. Within the return expression of the case or default clause, this variable name is bound to the value of the operand expression. Inside a case clause, the static type of the variable is the SequenceType named in the case clause. Inside a default clause, the static type of the variable is the same as the static type of the operand expression. If the value to be returned by a case or default clause does not depend on the value of the operand expression, the clause need not specify a variable." Thank you for this helpful comment. Please let us know whether the Schema Working Group considers this to be an adequate response. Regards, --Don Chamberlin, for the Query Working Group
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2004 00:44:58 UTC