- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:06:21 -0700
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- CC: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Picky, picky! I'll fix that. All the best, Ashok -----Original Message----- From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of David Carlisle Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 2:27 PM To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: Re: [F&O] Section 15.3 deep equal examples > Perhaps this is too far away from fn:deep-equal but it is defined This doesn't define $item2 other than saying it's the second item, and if that item were deep-equal to the first (which it may be) then the example: fn:deep-equal($item1, $item2) returns false. would be false. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2004 08:48:22 UTC