- From: Don Chamberlin <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:42:30 -0400
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2004 18:43:41 UTC
Martin, This is a reply from the Query Working Group to the following comment posted in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2004Feb/0415.html: [10] 3.7.2: Not requiring CDATA constructs to be serialized as CDATA sections is a good idea, because it helps dispell the idea that CDATA sections are semantically significant. The Query Working Group agrees with this comment. The XQuery 1.0 working draft published on 23 July 2004 makes it clear that CDATA constructs affect only the interpretation of special characters in the content of a direct element constructors. There is no CDATA construct in the XQuery data model, and CDATA has no effect on serialization. Please let us know if you have any further concerns relating to this comment. Regards, --Don Chamberlin, for the Query Working Group
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2004 18:43:41 UTC