- From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:47:09 -0400
- To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>
- CC: XML Query Comments <public-qt-comments@w3.org>, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, w3c-i18n-wg@w3.org
I neglected to add:
Please let us know if you object to this disposition of your issue.
Jonathan
Jonathan Robie wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> This is an official response from the W3C XML Query Working Group. In
> [1], you said:
>
> [4] The special conventions for escaping quotes (production
> [17]), apostrophes ([25]), and curly braces (should probably also
> be a production of its own) may not be necessary. Character
> references should be used, for convenience, named character
> references for { and } could be defined.
>
> Yes, this is certainly true. The escape mechanism is just a convenience,
> and is often easier to use than character references, especially in a
> stylesheet. Consider the following example:
>
> <template select="./[name = 'Ben &amp; Jerry&apos;s']"/>
>
> It's easier to write this as:
>
> <template select="./[name = 'Ben && Jerry''s']"/>
>
> And it's also easier to think about what this means.
>
> Jonathan
>
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2004 16:47:43 UTC