- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:12:48 -0800
- To: "Liam Quin" <liam@w3.org>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
I think the ability to either define functions external or import a function library from a URL is sufficient for this purpose. Adding additional syntax seem like just adding complexity for little gain... Best regards Michael (speaking for myself) > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Liam Quin > Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 10:14 AM > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: [XQuery] LQ-XQ-02 - Calling a Web Serice > > > The Web Serice Description Language (WSDL) [1] provides a facility for > describing Web services - a WSDL document could be thought of as an > XML description of a set of function signatures. > > Some XML Query implementations will very likely support the idea > of calling such functions in XPath expressions. > > Would it increase interoperability of such implementations if > one could explicitly associate a namespace prefix with a WSDL > document in the XML Query Prolog? > > For example, > import service cvt at "http://example.org/wsdl/cvt.wsdl"; > > and then, in the body of the query, one might be able to use > cvt:convert("F", "C", 23.6) > to convert between temperatures. > > An alternative to extending the prolog might be to extend access > to an implementation's underlying URI resolver, so that users > could implement WSDL support in XQuery directly. > > However, interoperability and integration between specifications > is important to the W3C. > > Liam > > > [1] Web Services Description Language, > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-wsdl20-20031110/ > > -- > Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ > http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/
Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 19:13:39 UTC