- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:49:46 GMT
- To: liam@w3.org
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Liam> Actually no, it *is* clearer. Perhaps (or perhaps not:-) but anyway incompatible with XPath 1. Given that specifying positions greater than the string length is not an error and just silently does the natural thing of not selecting anything, the behaviour of negative starting values seems perfectly natural to me. David
Received on Sunday, 14 March 2004 18:38:48 UTC