RE: [F&O] IBM-FO-027: Bug in example: wrong answer? from Ashok Malhotra on 2004-03-10 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from March 2004)

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:04:27 -0800
To: "Don Chamberlin" <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EDB607C8AC991F40BE646533A1A673E8017EA80F@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Yes, that seems to be the correct answer.  Thanks for spotting this!

 

All the best, Ashok 

________________________________

From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Don Chamberlin
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 5:55 AM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: [F&O] IBM-FO-027: Bug in example: wrong answer?

 


(IBM-FO-027): Section 9.4.18, fn:get-hours-from-time(), contains four
bulleted examples, and states that the last example returns 6. Please
take a close look at this. I think the correct result for this example
is 20. 

--Don Chamberlin

Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 18:05:01 UTC