- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 00:32:55 -0800
- To: "Michael Kay" <mhk@mhk.me.uk>, "Don Chamberlin" <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>, "Daniela Florescu" <danielaf@bea.com>
- Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EDB607C8AC991F40BE646533A1A673E80175A648@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
The joint WGs agreed to make this change on March 6, 2003. All the best, Ashok ________________________________ From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kay Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:00 AM To: 'Don Chamberlin'; 'Daniela Florescu' Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: [F+O] base-URI() undefined [was RE: [XQuery] BEA_028] In this case it would be consistent to change the definition of the zero-argument base-uri() function in F+O so that if no base URI is defined in the static context, an empty sequence is returned. Michael Kay -----Original Message----- From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Don Chamberlin Sent: 19 February 2004 00:55 To: Daniela Florescu Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: Re: [XQuery] BEA_028 Dear Daniela, The following sentence has been added to XQuery Section 3.7.1: "If no Base URI is defined in the static context, the Base URIs of the constructed and copied nodes are set to the empty sequence." Similiar sentences have been added to Sections 3.7.3.1 and 3.7.3.3. Please let us know whether you are satisfied with this resolution of your issue. Regards, --Don Chamberlin Daniela Florescu <danielaf@bea.com> Sent by: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org 02/15/2004 10:25 PM To public-qt-comments@w3.org cc Subject [XQuery] BEA_028 XQuery: incomplete specification Section 3.7.1 and 3.7.3 discuss the base-uri property of the new nodes but does not say what should happen when the static context has no base uri defined.
Received on Sunday, 7 March 2004 03:33:26 UTC