- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 14:10:02 -0800
- To: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Sections 6.2 and others Editorial We reiterate our comment submitted during our first last call review at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jun/0325.html about rewriting the operator mapping to have op: functions allow to take empty sequences or at least call out where the empty sequence behaviour is defined. See also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jul/0190.html .
Received on Saturday, 6 March 2004 17:10:28 UTC