RE: [F+O] resolve-QName() from Ashok Malhotra on 2004-03-05 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from March 2004)

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 00:32:12 -0800
To: "Michael Kay" <mhk@mhk.me.uk>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EDB607C8AC991F40BE646533A1A673E801718165@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Thanks!  We agreed to make the suggested changes at the joint WG meeting
yesterday.

All the best, Ashok

-----Original Message-----
From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kay
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 1:41 PM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: [F+O] resolve-QName()

This function raises an error if the second argument is an empty
sequence. So why does the signature allow an empty sequence?

Also, the error raised (invalid lexical value) is inappropriate.

Michael Kay

Received on Friday, 5 March 2004 03:32:44 UTC