RE: [F&O] IBM-FO-022: Which function backs up "eq" on strings? from Ashok Malhotra on 2004-03-04 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from March 2004)

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:18:59 -0800
To: "Don Chamberlin" <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EDB607C8AC991F40BE646533A1A673E8017175FB@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Fixed.  Thanks!

 

All the best, Ashok 

________________________________

From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Don Chamberlin
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 5:52 AM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: [F&O] IBM-FO-022: Which function backs up "eq" on strings?

 


(IBM-FO-022): Section 7.3.2 says that fn:compare() with the second
signature backs up "eq" and other value comparisons on strings.
Actually, the first signature is used (since the value comparison
operators have no way to specify a non-default collation). 

--Don Chamberlin

Received on Thursday, 4 March 2004 11:19:32 UTC