- From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:37:59 -0000
- To: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 1 March 2004 10:38:26 UTC
Issue: qt-2004Jan0350-01 See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2004Jan/0350.html This comment proposed the addition of rules requiring an overriding definition of a variable, template, or function to declare a type consistent with the type of the object being overridden. For the record, this proposal has been withdrawn after WG review. On examination, such rules proved too restrictive; and in cases where the type is incompatible with the overridden object, this will usually result in a type error being reported at the point where the object is referenced or used. Michael Kay
Received on Monday, 1 March 2004 10:38:26 UTC