- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 22:45:56 +0100
- To: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>, <davidc@nag.co.uk>
David Carlisle raised this comment at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Dec/0120.html The WG considered the comment on 2004-01-20 and agreed that the current wording of the specification was inadequate and inconsistent. The editor was actioned to provide revised wording, which the WG will review. This needs to balance the need to provide interoperability by requiring all XSLT processors to accept stylesheet modules in the form of lexical XML documents, while also allowing the flexibility for stylesheet modules to be provided in other forms, e.g. as a document in the data model, or as a DOM, or as a lexical XML 1.1 document. The intention is to allow stylesheet modules to be expressed as XML 1.1 documents, but not to require XSLT 2.0 processors to accept such stylesheets. We are leaving the comment open for the time being. Regards, Michael Kay
Received on Sunday, 25 January 2004 16:48:11 UTC