RE: qt-2003Dec0145-01: [DM] MS-DM-LC2-028

I am not sure if you want to make the distinction between
implementation-defined and -dependent an editorial decision, although if
the WG already has decided it to be -dependent, then indeed it is
editorial to fix this.

Best regards
Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@datadirect.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 7:05 AM
> To: Michael Rys
> Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: qt-2003Dec0145-01: [DM] MS-DM-LC2-028
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> This is a response to the following message, which you posted to the
> comments list:
> 
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Dec/0145.html
> 
> Your comment has been classified as editorial, and assigned to the
> relevant
> editors, who will take it into consideration. An editorial comment is
one
> that does not change the language that is being specified. Please let
me
> know if you believe that we have misclassified your issue.
> 
> Jonathan
>

Received on Friday, 23 January 2004 10:11:21 UTC