RE: [DM] comment node constraints

> Since none of the constructors allow the generation, one could argue
that
> the data model does not necessarily need this constraint. 

This assumes that the only users of the DM specification will be XSLT
2.0 and XQuery 1.0.  Since we already know of other W3C WG's that are
proposing to use the DM I think it is safer to make the constraints
complete.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Rys
> Sent: January 21, 2004 4:44 PM
> To: Paul Cotton; public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Cc: David Carlisle
> Subject: RE: [DM] comment node constraints
> 
> Since none of the constructors allow the generation, one could argue
that
> the data model does not necessarily need this constraint. Although, if
you
> expose a virtual comment over another source, it still may be
worthwhile
> to add the constraint to the data model as well...
> 
> Best regards
> Michael
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Cotton
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 1:22 PM
> > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> > Cc: David Carlisle
> > Subject: [DM] comment node constraints
> >
> >
> > David Carlisle wrote:
> > > There is also the issue of whether the DM should disallow a
trailing -
> > > currently it only disallows --.
> >
> > This new Last Call comment will ensure that the apparent
inconsistency
> > between the DM and the rules for comment construction in XQuery and
XSLT
> > is resolved.
> >
> > /paulc
> >
> > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> > 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3
> > Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
> > mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@nag.co.uk]
> > > Sent: January 21, 2004 3:51 PM
> > > To: Paul Cotton
> > > Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> > > Subject: RE: [Xquery] Comment constructors
> > >
> > >
> > > That addresses my comment on the Xquery constructors thanks.
> > > There is also the issue of whether the DM should  disallow a
trailing
> > -
> > > currently it only disallows --.
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew
> >

Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2004 18:06:47 UTC