- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:29:10 -0800
- To: "Xavier Franc" <xfranc@online.fr>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EB0A327048144442AFB15FCE18DC96C701CA2936@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Re 1): If we cut the preservation, we can obviously add such a formatting function. Which I think is more useful anyway. Re 2): Your mail below seems to be mainly concerned about issues with non-timezone values that have implied timezones added for several functions. Our request below would a) preserve the absence of the timezone b) does not take any stance on the treatment of some of the functions that you complain about (we felt that since you already have submitted that comment, we did not need to in the context of the Data Model review). Best regards Michael ________________________________ From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Xavier Franc Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:21 PM To: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: Re: MS-DM-LC2-041 We believe that preserving the timezone information is overkill and should not be mandated to be preserved. Preserving presence and absence is enough, the values with a timezone should be normalized to UTC+0 and timezone generation should be left to formatting functions. 1) there is no date formatting function in XQuery 2) working only with UTC representations has unfortunate effects for users as explained in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Sep/0124.html (see also replies from Michael Kay)
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2004 15:29:17 UTC