- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:48:41 +0100
- To: "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>, <jim.melton@acm.org>
- Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
> However the current section seems to indicate that unless it > has a mismatched < and so directly embedding the unquoted > query would produce non-well formed XML, the Query can be > simply inlined without quoting into an XML document. In fact there are many other ways of writing a query that isn't well-formed XML, for example <foo bar="{<zing zang="3"/>/@zang}"/> is a legal XQuery. Moreover the following is legal both in XML and in XQuery, but with completely different parse trees: <foo bar="{<zing zang=" a="/>/@zang}"/> Imagine putting that through an XML parser and the parser reversing the order of the attributes! I personally think it would be a good idea to define a subset of XQuery syntax that parses correctly as XML, and is therefore safely embeddable. I think the expressive power of this subset would be identical to the current language, it would merely lose a bit of composability and place restrictions on the use of character references. The only real problem would be how to handle the "<" operator, which must be represented as < in XML but cannot be represented as < in XQuery. Michael Kay
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2004 07:48:25 UTC