- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:47:14 -0800
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
I agree with Michael that we should use node kind instead of node type. Otherwise this reads fine. Thanks Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:53 AM > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: [DM] MS-DM-LC2-033 > > / Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com> was heard to say: > | Section 3.2 Construction from an Infoset > | Editorial > | > | Strike the sentence starting "Constructing and". The meaning is unclear. > > Accepted. That sentence now reads: > > <p>An instance of the data model constructed from an information set > <rfc2119>must</rfc2119> be consistent with the description provided > for each node type.</p> > > Please let me know if this resolves the issue to your satisfaction. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. > NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended > recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. > Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. > If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by > reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2004 01:47:32 UTC