W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > January 2004

RE: [DM] MS-DM-LC2-033

From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:47:14 -0800
Message-ID: <EB0A327048144442AFB15FCE18DC96C701B70BE8@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

I agree with Michael that we should use node kind instead of node type.
Otherwise this reads fine.

Thanks
Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:53 AM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [DM] MS-DM-LC2-033
> 
> / Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com> was heard to say:
> | Section 3.2	Construction from an Infoset
> | Editorial
> |
> | Strike the sentence starting "Constructing and". The meaning is
unclear.
> 
> Accepted. That sentence now reads:
> 
> <p>An instance of the data model constructed from an information set
> <rfc2119>must</rfc2119> be consistent with the description provided
> for each node type.</p>
> 
> Please let me know if this resolves the issue to your satisfaction.
> 
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
> 
> --
> Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems,
Inc.
> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
> Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
> reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2004 01:47:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:52 UTC