W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2004

Re: [DM] BEA_006

From: Daniela Florescu <danielaf@bea.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:55:17 -0800
Message-Id: <635CB65E-67B3-11D8-A962-0003937198F4@bea.com>
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>

I accept the resolution because of the first argument.

However, SQL should not be brought as an argument,
unless we accept C++, Java, C#, Cobol, Lisp and all the other
programming languages to come with their own requirements.

Best regards,
Dana


On Feb 25, 2004, at 7:51 AM, Norman Walsh wrote:

> / Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com> was heard to say:
> | There are outside requirements to support XQuery on a document node 
> that
> | may contain more than one element besides XSLT. The SQL-2003 XML
> | Datatype follows that model.
> |
> | Restricting a document node now would not satisfy their requirements
> | either.
>
> In summary:
>
> - XML 1.0 defines external parsed entities which have multiple root 
> elements.
> - XSLT 1.0 backwards compatibility requires them.
> - SQL-2003 requires them.
>
> I believe this represents compelling evidence in favor of keeping the
> existing functionality.
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> -- 
> Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
> Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
> reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2004 11:55:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:55 UTC