- From: Daniela Florescu <danielaf@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:55:17 -0800
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
I accept the resolution because of the first argument. However, SQL should not be brought as an argument, unless we accept C++, Java, C#, Cobol, Lisp and all the other programming languages to come with their own requirements. Best regards, Dana On Feb 25, 2004, at 7:51 AM, Norman Walsh wrote: > / Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com> was heard to say: > | There are outside requirements to support XQuery on a document node > that > | may contain more than one element besides XSLT. The SQL-2003 XML > | Datatype follows that model. > | > | Restricting a document node now would not satisfy their requirements > | either. > > In summary: > > - XML 1.0 defines external parsed entities which have multiple root > elements. > - XSLT 1.0 backwards compatibility requires them. > - SQL-2003 requires them. > > I believe this represents compelling evidence in favor of keeping the > existing functionality. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. > NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended > recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. > Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. > If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by > reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2004 11:55:13 UTC