- From: Mike Fitzgerald <mikefz@wyeast.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:19:57 -0700
- To: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Michael Kay wrote: > Thanks for the comment. It will be considered by the WG. Good! > I can't treat this as being purely editorial because we don't currently > have a well-defined concept of deprecation. We have other attributes > such as data-type on xsl:sort that are retained solely for backwards > compatibility, but which are not deprecated as such. I like how required attributes are bold; I also like the addition of ? in XSLT 2.0 for optional attributes. Some sort of typographical mechanism, such as italics or a special color, for deprecated and backward compatible attributes would be a sight for sore eyes (sore from reading so many specs, that is). > We also need to be very careful that typographical conventions must > never be the only way in which information is communicated. Of course. Mike
Received on Friday, 20 February 2004 17:20:01 UTC