- From: Stephen Buxton <Stephen.Buxton@oracle.com>
- Date: 17 Feb 04 11:08:28
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
SECTION 7.3.1: Collations This section is at pains to say how to specify (reference) a collation, but it does not normatively say what a collation is. Contrast this with the XQuery Language working draft, 2.1.1 "Static context", item regarding in-scope collations, where it says "A collation may be regarded as an object that supports two functions..." and a description of those two functions. This tells me what a collation is. I think this definition logically belongs in F&O. The passage in the XQuery Language is merely telling how collations are part of the static context, and should not be the normative text for what a collation is. So what is the definition of collation? We have seen one definition in XQuery language. F&O Section 7.5 "Functions based on substring matching" has a different definition. It seems that a collation consists of: 1. "the capability of deciding whether two strings are considered equal, and if not, which of the strings should be regarded as preceding the other". This capability completely captures the two points mentioned in XQuery Language. 2. Optionally, "decompose the string into a sequence of units, each unit consisting of one or more characters, such that two strings can be compared by pairwise comparison of these units". This capability might be realized by a function taking a single argument of type xs:string and returning a sequence of type xs:string*, though I suspect that in practice implementations will find a way to represent the sequence with less overhead than actually using a sequence of the data model. 3. Some means of indicating whether the collation has item #2. This needs to be clarified. - Steve B.
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2004 14:08:34 UTC